Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5336 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2005 01:27:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 01:27:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 50373 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2005 01:28:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 50283 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2005 01:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 50236 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2005 01:28:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mail.app.aconex.com (HELO mail.app.aconex.com) (203.89.192.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:28:57 -0700 Received: from herald.aconex.com (unknown [192.168.0.211]) by mail.app.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139A915A1F8 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:27:31 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by herald.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7F064007 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:27:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from herald.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (herald [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20358-01 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:27:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (CPE-203-45-41-164.vic.bigpond.net.au [203.45.41.164]) by herald.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAC464002 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:27:29 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4272DEFF.8060700@aconex.com> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:27:27 +1000 From: Paul Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Performanc] References: <427198C5.5040408@aconex.com> <200504291942.19081@danielnaber.de> In-Reply-To: <200504291942.19081@danielnaber.de> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090001060407030806020608" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aconex.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --------------090001060407030806020608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >>At this rate I'm >>only getting on average 300-400-ish items/second added to the index. >> >> > >I think that's realistic for typical uses of Lucene on common hardware. > > > Thanks Daniel, that's at least comforting to know that it's at least expected. Can you or anyone else comment on the CPU profile I sent in? If there was a way of optimizing that loop, then it could mean a reasonable improvement in indexing speed. cheers, Paul Smith --------------090001060407030806020608--