Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7251 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2005 22:03:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2005 22:03:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 54257 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2005 22:04:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-java-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54226 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2005 22:04:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54213 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2005 22:04:54 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from shared4.hardhathosting.com (HELO getopt.org) (69.44.16.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:04:54 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.254] (75-mo3-2.acn.waw.pl [62.121.105.75]) (authenticated) by getopt.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3SM3vi13699 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:03:57 -0500 Message-ID: <42715DBB.2010005@getopt.org> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:03:39 +0200 From: Andrzej Bialecki User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: ParallelReader References: <42715364.70804@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <42715364.70804@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Doug Cutting wrote: > Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet > tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I > thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later. > > Would folks find this useful? This looks very useful. It gives an easy way to augment already existing indices, and without reindexing the main index. I can see a lot of possibilities... > > Should it go into the core or in contrib? I would vote for the core, if I could... -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org