lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Naber <daniel.na...@t-online.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r164695 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Hit.java src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/HitIterator.java src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Hits.java src/test/org/apache/lucene/TestHitIterator.java
Date Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:51:03 GMT
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 21:09, Erik Hatcher wrote:

> I don't know.... would it?  I have no preference, though it seems ok to
> me to simply return null since this is the toString method.  For a
> Document, the toString is only useful for debugging anyway.

Yes, and during debugging it would be especially confusing to just hide the 
exception. Sure, people will see that there's a problem with a "null" 
document, but then why not show the exception directly?

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message