lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34563] New: - Efficient Sorting of DateField/DateTools Encoded Timestamp Long Values
Date Fri, 22 Apr 2005 06:04:35 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34563>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34563

           Summary: Efficient Sorting of DateField/DateTools Encoded
                    Timestamp Long Values
           Product: Lucene
           Version: 1.4
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: Search
        AssignedTo: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: rbpandey@gmail.com


Hello Tim,

As promised, the sort functionality for "long" values is included in the
attached files.

patchTestSort.txt contains the diff info. for my modifications to the
TestSort.java class

org.apache.lucene.search.ZIP contains the three new class files for
efficient sorting of "long" field values and of encoded timestamp
field values as "long" values.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Rus

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message