lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()
Date Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:41:27 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841





------- Additional Comments From siberski@learninglab.de  2005-04-06 18:41 -------
Sorry for the late reply; I'm currently traveling and had no Internet access.
Chucks analysis is completely correct. Serializing a (Multi-)Searcher doesn't
make sense, instead the Similarity has to be passed with the weight.

What I don't understand is why the patch failed. I checked the diff file again,
and the necessary changes appear to be in it. For example, line 89 of the diff
contains the addition of 'throws IOException' to BooleanWeight2.createWeight(),
and the corresponding change for MultiPhraseQueryWeight is on line 346. The
changes required for TermWeight are at starting at line 1187. Could you please
check if everything went ok when applying the patch, by comparing manually to
the diff file when errors occur somewhere?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message