lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()
Date Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:09:02 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841





------- Additional Comments From chuck@manawiz.com  2005-04-05 21:09 -------
One more note on this.  I think conforming to the new Weight protocol, i.e.
eliminating the searcher field from BooleanWeight, BooleanWeight2, and
MultiPhraseWeight, is quite important.  This is because the Weight is now sent
to RemoteSearchables instead of the Query.  If Weights have a searcher field,
then this could be quite expensive.

Chuck


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message