Mailing-List: contact java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <424BC8EE.6080300@l3s.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:54:54 +0200
From: Wolf Siberski <siberski@l3s.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (Windows/20041201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lucene Developers List <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: How to proceed with Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with
 Similarity.docFreq()
 ?
References: 
 <E3381E0825F1954D953A4E347017BB1C03209554@reh001-1.REX001.ExchangeByRegister.com>
 <41FA05CA.9010708@detego-software.de> <41FA6EBE.8020503@apache.org>
 <4215E023.6000608@l3s.de> <421A21B6.4020209@apache.org>
 <421B5276.9090801@l3s.de> <421B7D96.7090001@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <421B7D96.7090001@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

As some time has passed now since I submitted the Multisearcher
patch, and no objections have been raised, I would like to ask
to commit it now. I have put substantial effort into it, and my
concern is that conflicts with newer patches will emerge if
the commit is delayed further.

Thanks,
Wolf


Doug Cutting wrote:
> Wolf Siberski wrote:
> 
> This patch now looks great to me.  +1
> 
> Does anyone object to comitting this patch?
> 
>   http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841
> 
> Doug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org