Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42874 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2005 17:20:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 17:20:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 69646 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2005 17:20:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69189 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2005 17:20:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69176 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2005 17:20:44 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:20:43 -0800 Received: from [192.168.168.81] (c-24-5-160-217.client.comcast.net[24.5.160.217]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005021417203901300mf1a3e>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:20:39 +0000 Message-ID: <4210DDE6.4040302@apache.org> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:20:38 -0800 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: lucene.apache.org References: <9b842f56e7e48f7ae342c8f7aeb2ed22@ehatchersolutions.com> <84188a96ebaaa04d5f8a90522f445e7f@ehatchersolutions.com> In-Reply-To: <84188a96ebaaa04d5f8a90522f445e7f@ehatchersolutions.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Erik Hatcher wrote: > I have checked out our current site to the lucene.apache.org area, and > I've also set up a redirect from the jakarta.apache.org/lucene area. Keep in mind, there are two projects here: 1. Porting Java Lucene's site to Forrest. This should be structured as a sub-project of lucene.apache.org. It should be maintained in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/docs/. 2. Building a new site for lucene.apache.org. This should initially contain a single sub-project, "Lucene Java". This site should be maintained in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/site/. We expect to shortly be adding more sub-projects, and we don't want to have to re-structure the site again soon, so let's structure it for the long-term from the start. Make sense? Do we need a separate logo for Lucene Java? Now I'm beginning to see the need for Murray Altheim's logo work: http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg07799.html If we adopted this, then we could use the same font to easily generate logos for "Lucene Java", "Lucene 4c", "Lucene .Net", etc. Some potential sub-projects (e.g., Nutch) already have distinct logos, but it might make sense to use similar logos for ports. Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org