Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43798 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2005 22:51:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 22:51:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 60225 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2005 22:51:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 59813 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2005 22:51:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 59800 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2005 22:51:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.200.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:51:21 -0800 Received: (qmail 27634 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Feb 2005 22:51:19 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=HdUIKnGDDAuiR0zTJXG0u0qvdo+2cy/q2cqx+lyUBEyI+M1lQNu2/LO2J0jmXevQP4gA5M5skaUxENkdqNbymMXVA3yGUv9FEbUZtJYMFiOpOry0JqeB+DV0v0WKoLdRbAtRGBE/bSXwOopkwqCTQJ6gM9io73v7WF5qd1bKAGU= ; Message-ID: <20050214225119.27632.qmail@web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.194.17.194] by web31101.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:51:19 PST Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:51:19 -0800 (PST) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: lucene.apache.org To: Lucene Developers List In-Reply-To: <42111CBA.7010007@electricjellyfish.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm with Garrett. I think we do need a top level dev@ list for discussion of cross-port issues, like index format and compatibility, etc. We also need per-port and per-app lists. Otis --- Garrett Rooney wrote: > Doug Cutting wrote: > > Erik Hatcher wrote: > > > >> I've amended my request for e-mail lists here with Doug's > preference: > >> > >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-195 > > > > > > Do others agree this is the best approach? I don't mean to be > > autocratic. Do we imagine different pools of users and developers > for > > different Lucene sub-projects, or one big pool for all of them? I > > assume they'll be mostly disjoint. > > Personally I'm in favor of separate lists for subprojects, with a > separate list for the top level for discussing things like changing > file > formats and other stuff that more than one port would need to be > concerned about. I didn't bring it up before since I'm the new kid > on > the block and I didn't want to seem presumptuous. > > -garrett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org