Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11572 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 04:35:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 04:35:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 75068 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2005 04:35:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 75037 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2005 04:35:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 75022 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2005 04:35:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:35:36 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1A4ZXch023577 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:35:33 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j1A4ZWpZ023575; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:35:32 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:35:32 +0100 Message-Id: <200502100435.j1A4ZWpZ023575@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33459] - Weird BooleanQuery behavior X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33459 ------- Additional Comments From appler@gmail.com 2005-02-10 05:35 ------- I've checked with 1.4.3 and current development snapshot. It passes fine. My lucene-x.jar file was packed around 29th Nov, 2004 and some intermediate development code could be the cause of that behavior. I think this issue can be closed. And also, I'll attach a revised test case using RAMDirectory instead of FSDirectory, and textX() methods split so it's more clear to see. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org