lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kelvin Tan <kelvin-li...@relevanz.com>
Subject Re: Study Group (WAS Re: Normalized Scoring)
Date Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:30:58 GMT
Hey Paul, thanks for responding.

On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:26:24 +0100, Paul Elschot wrote:
>
> Tuning the scoring is difficult because one needs to avoid the trap
> of optimizing for the test collection and test queries at hand. The
> interplays between query structure, coord(), idf() and tf() add to
> the complexity.
>
> As long as the discussion is on possible additions/improvements
> /tunings/extensions to Lucene, I think lucene-dev is a good
> platform. For example, there is some code in bugzilla for
> variations on idf():
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32942 and tf():
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31784 and the
> MultiFieldQuery things are here:
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32674
>

Thanks for the references, and for updating the Wiki. I'll plough through the list archives
and see what else I can dig up, like related papers/publications, etc and update the wiki.


k



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message