lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Naber <daniel.na...@t-online.de>
Subject Re: BitSet implementation and large index
Date Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:07:11 GMT
On Monday 14 February 2005 16:29, tony@simpleobjects.com wrote:

> It seems that for a huge index, it might be a good idea to use a
> different implementation of the BitSet when doing filtering (assuming
> the non-filtered set is relatively small).  This would really help
> minimize the memory required for each filter operation.

This already exists:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message