Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22619 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 11:48:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 11:48:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 88244 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 11:48:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88210 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2005 11:48:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88188 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2005 11:48:54 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=10.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (HELO outmx014.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.2.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:48:53 -0800 Received: from outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j07BmkX5007934 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:48:46 +0100 (envelope-from ) Received: from DELLLAT1L34N0J (197.193-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.193.197]) by outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with SMTP id j07Bmhw5007902; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:48:43 +0100 (envelope-from ) Reply-To: From: "Jean-Francois Halleux" To: "Lucene Developers List" , "Yura Smolsky" Subject: RE: Re[2]: RemoteSearcher Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:51:24 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <1961613235.20050107103248@altervision.biz> Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi there, FYI, I've implemented a ParallelMultiSearcher back in January. It is available in the base package, together with unit tests. Should be easy enough to build your distributed app from there. If I'm not mistaking, it could be improved from its threading perspective (one thread is created per searchable for each search now). KR, Jean-Francois Halleux -----Original Message----- From: Yura Smolsky [mailto:info@altervision.biz] Sent: vendredi 7 janvier 2005 9:33 To: Lucene List Subject: Re[2]: RemoteSearcher Hello, Otis. Interesting. Nutch doesnt use RemoteSearchable b/b RemoteSearchable is not very useful? I mean does it suitable for distibuting index process in parallel on many services or not? Will it give us good performance. We have RemoteSearchable in the sources, but anyone does not use it. :) I ask this question, b/c I use PyLucene (very good port in Python) and I need to realize a lot of things about implementation of RemoteSearchable in omniORBpy (CORBA). I have big index (3,000,000 docs) and many fields. I have noticed, that search becomes slower. I want to distribute index on many servers. Does RemoteSearchable worse of it? BTW, Is there working demo of nutch with big index? OG> Nutch (nutch.org) has a pretty sophisticated infrastructure for OG> distributed searching, but it doesn't use RemoteSearcher. >> >> Does anyone know application which based on RemoteSearcher to >> distribute index on many servers? >> Yura Smolsky, --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org