Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85076 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2005 19:55:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2005 19:55:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 59186 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2005 19:55:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 59156 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2005 19:55:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 59111 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2005 19:55:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:55:43 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0JJtewb016233 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:55:40 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j0JJteV2016231; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:55:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:55:40 +0100 Message-Id: <200501191955.j0JJteV2016231@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31785] - DisjunctionScorer X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31785 ------- Additional Comments From goller@detego-software.de 2005-01-19 20:55 ------- Hi Paul, I finally found time to look into your code in detail and I think it's really excellent work. Before committing it, I have a few questions. *) In your source files you have included a copyright statement referring to yourself. Of course you include the Apache License. However, I haven't seen other source files in Lucene with similar copyright statements. I don't know the legal consequences of that. Maybe someone else on the list knows more. The simplest solution would be to substitute "Copyright 2004 Paul Elschot" with "Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation". Would you agree? *) BooleanScorer2 extends NrMatchersScorer and nrMatchers() always returns 1. Is there a reason for that? I think it should either only extend Scorer or deliver the correct values. I opt for extending Scorer only. *) All NrMatchersScorers except for BooleanScorer2 and ConjunctionScorer don't use a similarity implementation. They compute raw scores and nrMatches. ConjunctionScorer is a hybrid. It uses coord-factors and is is used as NrMatchersScorer. This could lead to incorrect results with Similarity implementations other than DefaultSimilarity. A ConjunctionScorer used as NrMathesScorer should compute raw scores, if used as standard Scorer it should use coord-factors. How can we achieve this in an elegant way? Christoph -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org