lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wolf Siberski <siber...@l3s.de>
Subject How to proceed with Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq() ?
Date Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:55:09 GMT
As I'm very interested in resolving this bug,
I would like to resume the discussion about it.
Chuck Williams (the original bug reporter) and me
both already have provided a patch. Is any of the
committers willing to review them?
If changes are necessary, or another way of handling
this issue turns out to be more appropriate, I would
gladly put more work into that area.
But I need the support of (at least) one committer, and
also IMHO some additional discussion about how to tackle
that issue wouldn't hurt, too.

--Wolf


bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31841
> 
> 
> daniel.naber@t-online.de changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |feigao@sohu-inc.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From daniel.naber@t-online.de  2005-01-04 23:49 -------
> *** Bug 32053 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message