lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Naber <daniel.na...@t-online.de>
Subject Re: Scoring benchmark evaluation. Was RE: How to proceed with Bug 31841 - MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq() ?
Date Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:20:54 GMT
On Friday 28 January 2005 22:45, Chuck Williams wrote:

> The fact that is requires all terms in all
> fields is part of the problem.  Once that is addressed, another problem
> is that Lucene does not provide a good mechanis

That's fixed in CVS, so maybe the CVS version should be used for the 
evaluation. I think it should be robust.

Regards
 Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message