lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32999] - nightly build/javadocs for sandbox
Date Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:47:55 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32999>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32999





------- Additional Comments From cutting@apache.org  2005-01-10 19:47 -------
I think the plan (correct me if I'm wrong) is to fold the most useful of the
sandbox items into the standard Lucene build tree when Lucene's code is moved to
a top-level project.  They'll still be packaged into separate jar file(s).

Once this happens, javadocs could either be built in a separate tree, or,
perhaps better yet, put them in separate javadoc group(s):

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#group

For example, Nutch uses groups to separate the Core 
APIs from plugins:

http://www.nutch.org/docs/api/overview-summary.html


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message