lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Garrett Rooney <>
Subject Re: Migration to SVN?
Date Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:26:32 GMT
Giulio Cesare Solaroli wrote:
> I am not a commiter (just an happy user!), but I would suggest the
> following layout:
> asf-repo/
>   jakarta/
>     lucene/
>       trunk/
>          core/
>          sandbox/
>       branches/
>       tags/
> This layout will allow tags and branches of both core and sandbox to
> be kept in sync without any effort.
> Does this make any sense?

Six of one, half dozen of the other.  Honestly, I prefer to split the 
projects out and give them their own trunk/branches/tags directories, 
just because it seems cleaner to me and additionally because it's the 
way other projects I've known at the ASF run things.  I like to be able 
to look in the branches and tags directory and know what the 
tags/branches correspond to immediately, as opposed to this kind of 
layout where a branch/tag could be just the core, just the sandbox, 
both, etc.  You wouldn't want to always branch/tag both, but sometimes 
you might, the ambiguity bothers me.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message