David Spencer wrote:
> Doug Cutting wrote:
>
>> I don't feel too proprietary. Do folks prefer Murray's reworked
>> Lucene logo or the original logo?
>
>
> I'm sorry, but I prefer the orig. The new one seems too elongated to me.
Me too... I think the "e" in the new font is unreadable, and the new
logo is too angular, the old one is more rotund at the edges, and the
old "n" provides a nice break in the baseline...
OTOH, I always had this (intended, according to Doug) impression that
the original logo belongs to the 60' era, and denotes something
outdated, old. So perhaps this is a good opportunity to bring it into
the new era... :
______
___ / ____ ________________________
__ / _ / / / ___/ _ \_ __ \ _ \
_ /___/ /_/ // /__ / __/ / / / __/
/_____/\__,_/ \___/ \___//_/ /_/\___/ (courtesy of figlet(6) )
Just my 0.02 PLN ;-)
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki
-------------------------------------------------
Software Architect, System Integration Specialist
CEN/ISSS EC Workshop, ECIMF project chair
EU FP6 E-Commerce Expert/Evaluator
-------------------------------------------------
FreeBSD developer (http://www.freebsd.org)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|