Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
From: Daniel Naber <daniel.naber@t-online.de>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: the future of MultiFieldQueryParser
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:48:13 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <04Nov15.130431pst."58617"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
In-Reply-To: <04Nov15.130431pst."58617"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411152348.13080@danielnaber.de>

On Monday 15 November 2004 22:04, Bill Janssen wrote:

> I've already addressed this issue a few months ago on the lucene-users
> list. =C2=A0My improved version of MultiFieldQueryParser is at
> ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/transient/janssen/SearchTest.java.

Do you see any advantage of your implementation over the one I posted to=20
the list? I'd prefer mine (actually Eric Jain's) as it's shorter and=20
doesn't require "instanceof". BTW, both don't properly support the new=20
=46uzzyQuery that lets you set a minimum similarity. I'll fix my proposal=20
accordingly.

Regards
 Daniel

=2D-=20
http://www.danielnaber.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org