Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Date: 8 Nov 2004 09:33:52 -0000
Message-ID: <20041108093352.17239.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Cc: 
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32109]  -
    Spurious TooManyClauses error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32109>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32109

Spurious TooManyClauses error

jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME


------- Additional Comments From jakarta@ehatchersolutions.com  2004-11-08 09:33 -------
This behavior by design.  The issue is that BooleanQuery has a default limit of 1024 clauses.  In your 
case, you're using a date range that expands to more than this number.  Two options that immediately 
come to mind are to increase the number of allowed boolean clauses (at the expense of resources used 
during the query) or to index (and query) a field by year (or quarter) such that there are far fewer terms 
that match.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org