lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christoph Goller <gol...@detego-software.de>
Subject Re: cvs commit: jakarta-lucene/xdocs index.xml
Date Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:40:22 GMT
Erik Hatcher schrieb:
> 
> On Nov 26, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Christoph Goller wrote:
> 
>> Erik Hatcher schrieb:
>>
>>> On Nov 26, 2004, at 12:09 PM, Christoph Goller wrote:
>>>
>>>> The distribution will contain docs and API from branch 1.4.3.
>>>> For the web-page I plan to use docs from the CVS head, but API
>>>> Javadoc from 1.4.3 branch. Does this sound reasonable?
>>>
>>> I think you should use everything from the 1.4.3 branch.
>>
>>
>> I don't think so. There have been a couple of updates on
>> xcocs, e.g. changes concerning the file-format. These changes
>> explicitly say what will change in Lucene 1.9 ....
>> Furthermore there are changes on whoweare.html
> 
> 
> So why not merge these changes back to 1.4.3 and keep the site purely at 
> that branch?

Well, it seems that the Lucene website is something that changes more often
than releases. So I don't see much sense in using the outdated 1.4.3 branch
version of the web-site. I could overwrite the 1.4.3 xdocs with the version
from head. This would make sense. Are you suggesting this?

Christoph

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message