Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97698 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 16:11:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 16:11:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 15752 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2004 16:11:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15704 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2004 16:11:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 15691 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2004 16:11:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.10.110.95] (HELO londo.swishmail.com) (209.10.110.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:11:30 -0700 Received: (qmail 86378 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2004 16:11:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.168.81?) (postmaster@cottrell-cutting.net@24.5.163.156) by londo.swishmail.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 16:11:28 -0000 Message-ID: <416AB002.7040502@apache.org> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:08:34 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040806 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: PhrasePrefixQuery -> MultiPhraseQuery References: <200410102138.18264@danielnaber.de> In-Reply-To: <200410102138.18264@danielnaber.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Daniel Naber wrote: > I copied PhrasePrefixQuery to MultiPhraseQuery, decprecating > PhrasePrefixQuery. The wiki also suggests to make MultipleTermPositions a > private nested class. However, it is public currently so I wonder whether > we can just remove/deprecate it without offering an alternative. Any > opinions? I don't feel too strongly about this. I doubt anyone uses this class directly, so we could just remove it and wait until we make a 1.9 RC, and see if anyone complains then. Or we could just leave it public and improve it's javadoc. It is well-named and well-implemented, and may be useful for other things, although I can't think what they are... What do others think? Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org