Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69012 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2004 16:13:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2004 16:13:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 71235 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2004 16:13:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 71126 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2004 16:13:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 71112 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2004 16:13:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.136.173.244] (HELO web12707.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.173.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 09:13:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20041003161316.95976.qmail@web12707.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [195.29.53.33] by web12707.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 09:13:16 PDT Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 09:13:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: lucene.net no more? To: Lucene Developers List In-Reply-To: <41481A58.9080509@getopt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello, I've contacted Pasha (Lucene.Net developer) and while he said one could continue Lucene.Net development (code was released under ASL), he didn't show any interest in helping me locate the latest version of the sources. :( I am now wondering if there is anyone on lucene-dev list interested in taking over Lucene.Net development? The latest sources are here: http://lucenedotnet.wz.cz/. Otis P.S. Related blog entry from Aaron Johnson: http://cephas.net/blog/2004/09/21/conflicting_mindsets_of_c_vs_java_part_ii.html#000732 P.P.S. If nobody here is interested, I'll take this to lucene-user - larger audience. --- Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > Hm, hm, hm, hm. > > And we just copy-edited the Lucene Ports chapter, where we cover > > Lucene.Net. Now what? :) > > > > I wonder if this is related to Microsoft's purchase of Lookout, > which > > uses Lucene.Net. I also wonder whether the licence allows this... > > ASL allows this, given that you put proper notices in the > documentation > / source code (if you distribute any source code). However, AFAIR the > > terms of service at SF.net don't allow such removal, and the staff at > > SF.net should be notified and take some action... > > Reaching an amicable conclusion to this would be preferrable, of > course, > but there is also a procedure to overtake a project at SF.net, it > takes > ca. 3 weeks to complete, perhaps shorter if you can prove violation > of > terms of service. But I think it's easier to restore the project > under > another name, based on the latest published sources... > > -- > Best regards, > Andrzej Bialecki > > ------------------------------------------------- > Software Architect, System Integration Specialist > CEN/ISSS EC Workshop, ECIMF project chair > EU FP6 E-Commerce Expert/Evaluator > ------------------------------------------------- > FreeBSD developer (http://www.freebsd.org) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org