lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pete Lewis" <p...@uptima.co.uk>
Subject Re: Question about PorterStemFilter class
Date Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:42:04 GMT
Snowball = Porter for English ;-)

Pete

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Erik Hatcher" <erik@ehatchersolutions.com>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Question about PorterStemFilter class


> On Oct 29, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Murray Altheim wrote:
> > In short, I *think* I'm using a newer version of the code than the
> > one in the repository, plus I've cleaned it up.
> 
> Can you provide some tests that show differences in how it stems 
> between yours and the built-in one?
> 
> The PorterStemFilter is not used by any built-in Analyzers, so I 
> actually think we should move it out to the Analyzers Sandbox area or 
> deprecate it in favor of the Snowball stemmer.  Thoughts?
> 
> Erik
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message