lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: sandbox -> core ?
Date Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:54:40 GMT

> In general, I'm a proponent of bundling as much as possible into a 
> single CVS tree and build procedure, since it makes it much easier to
> 
> keep things synchronized.  If folks feel the jar is too big, then we
> can 
> always build these into a separate jar.  I'd also vote to put
> analyzers 
> in the same CVS tree and under the top-level build.xml, for the same 
> reason.  If we like, we could put them each in subdirectories of 
> src/analyzers, and have each built as a separate jar.  Thoughts?

I like this idea.  I don't care so much about 1 or more CVS
repositories, as much as separate Jars, so if we can make
analyzers-1.4.2.jar and highlighter-1.4.2.jar along lucene-1.4.2.jar,
that would be ideal, in my opinion.

> The sandbox should be for experimental stuff.  Stuff that's proven 
> widely useful should go into the main tree and get released along
> with 
> every Lucene release.

True.

Otis

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message