Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94877 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2004 16:05:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2004 16:05:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 40732 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2004 16:05:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40630 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2004 16:05:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 40616 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2004 16:05:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.136.173.245] (HELO web12708.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.173.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:05:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20040917160534.87554.qmail@web12708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [195.29.107.206] by web12708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:05:34 PDT Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:05:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: lucene.net no more? To: Lucene Developers List In-Reply-To: <414B0640.8090706@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I was thinking the same. As a matter of fact, I'm talking to Pasha (Lucene.Net) to see if he/they would be willing to give away the source code. Somebody else would have to look into licenses, see whether SF has the right to give the project to somebody else, etc. I'd like to help with this, but I am too busy to push this until mid-November. Otis --- Doug Cutting wrote: > Yussef Alkhamrichi wrote: > > The main target for the .NET porters is now to get a SourceForge > > workspace to continue the .NET port of Lucene. Mohammed is > contacting > > the developers of NLucene and see if we can work something out > together > > to use their space and name for the real open source .NET brother > (or > > sister:) of the Java Lucene version. > > Perhaps it is time to start bringing the various Lucene ports under > the > Apache umbrella. If we made Lucene a top-level Apache project rather > > than a Jakarta sub-project, at lucene.apache.org rather than > jakarta.apache.org/lucene, then we could have sub-projects for each > implementation (Java, C++, C#, Perl, etc.). The primary obstacle to > this is a lack of volunteers who are willing to do the legwork of > re-assembling the website, cvs, mailing lists, etc. I am currently > overbooked and cannot take this on. > > This would prevent this sort of thing in the future: an Apache > sub-project cannot be unilaterally closed. > > Doug > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org