Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20887 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2004 16:54:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2004 16:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 69916 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2004 16:54:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69882 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2004 16:54:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69868 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2004 16:54:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.10.110.95] (HELO londo.swishmail.com) (209.10.110.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:54:40 -0700 Received: (qmail 6631 invoked by uid 89); 30 Aug 2004 16:54:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.168.81?) (postmaster@cottrell-cutting.net@24.5.163.156) by londo.swishmail.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Aug 2004 16:54:38 -0000 Message-ID: <41335B7F.2080006@apache.org> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:53:19 -0700 From: Doug Cutting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040806 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: API cleanup for Field References: <20040830164251.38290.qmail@web12706.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040830164251.38290.qmail@web12706.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > I like short names, too, but maybe Field.Vector.NO will make somebody > think java.util.Vector. How about Field.TermVector or Field.TVector, > or Field.TV? Field.TermVector seems redundant to me, and Field.TV too telegraphic. I think, in this context, the use of Vector is unambiguous. Also, doesn't everyone use ArrayList now instead of Vector? What do others think? Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org