Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89187 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 18:36:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 18:36:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 17159 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2004 18:36:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16837 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2004 18:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 16813 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2004 18:36:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [194.25.134.19] (HELO mailout06.sul.t-online.com) (194.25.134.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:36:03 -0700 Received: from fwd03.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Bx8oT-0008WV-01; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:36:01 +0200 Received: from p54802BBA.dip.t-dialin.net (Z631RkZbreQKgH-QlBJ0ci6jrPNHKFB-9dEnGPhc7o8LgJgZJ9h3Q+@[84.128.43.186]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Bx8oD-13GMfg0; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:35:45 +0200 From: Daniel Naber To: "Lucene Developers List" Subject: Re: the future of DateField Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:37:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.82 References: <200408171735.03548@danielnaber.de> <1092764048.7071.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41224567.8010206@koberg.com> In-Reply-To: <41224567.8010206@koberg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200408172037.28652@danielnaber.de> X-ID: Z631RkZbreQKgH-QlBJ0ci6jrPNHKFB-9dEnGPhc7o8LgJgZJ9h3Q+@t-dialin.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tuesday 17 August 2004 19:50, Robert Koberg wrote: > Why can't Field.Text > be used? In other words, why cant the date string be tokenized? What would you gain? If you tokenize "2004-08-12" into 2004, 08, 12 you can only find that date with a phrase query, which is slower than a term query. Also, you can search for "12" but you get both documents from December and those from the 12th of any month, which doesn't make sense. Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org