Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10785 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2004 11:43:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2004 11:43:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 3184 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2004 11:43:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3153 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2004 11:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3131 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2004 11:43:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [216.136.173.243] (HELO web12706.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.173.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 04:42:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20040815114255.94776.qmail@web12706.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [195.29.108.237] by web12706.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 04:42:55 PDT Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 04:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: moving the analyzers into sandbox To: Lucene Developers List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 for moving analyzers to the sandbox. We've talked about this before, and I believe that is what we concluded with. +1 for releasing at least some Sandbox components. Analyzers, Snowball Analyzers and Highligher at least. Is this something you can/want to do, Daniel? Otis --- Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On Aug 14, 2004, at 1:34 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: > > any objections against moving the German and Russian analyzers into > the > > sandbox? If not, I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure if we > already > > agreed on doing so. The current situation with analyzers both in > > lucene's > > core and in the sandbox doesn't seem to make sense. > > +1 on moving those analyzers out. > > > I suggest that we provide an lucene-analyzers.tar.gz with the > upcoming > > releases so that people don't have to check out the sandbox from > CVS to > > make use of the analyzers. > > We should go even further and release all sandbox components along > with > each release - this would give more exposure to the highlighter, > snowball analyzer, and the others. Maybe we shouldn't package > everything that way, as some things might tend to cause more support > issues, such as WordNet which requires a few additional steps to make > > use of. Thoughts? At the very least though, analyzers, highlighter, > > and snowball make great sense to package and version with Lucene core > > releases, I think. > > Erik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org