Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16673 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2004 20:14:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jun 2004 20:14:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 18076 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2004 20:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18018 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2004 20:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17969 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2004 20:14:43 -0000 Received: from [64.233.170.199] (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:14:43 -0700 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 62so342833rni for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.92.73 with SMTP id p73mr75003rnb; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:14:17 -0500 From: Luke Nezda To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Compound SpanQuery sub-classes Query Boost Implementation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello - My colleagues and I agree, Lucene is one of the best things since sliced bread. I am using the SpanQuery sub-classes heavily in my beta application (to the exclusion of all other Query sub-types) and have found it a very powerful construct. I have looked at the source and SpanQuery boosting doesn't seem to be implemented yet for the compond SpanQuery sub-classes (SpanOrQuery, SpanNearQuery, SpanNotQuery, SpanNearQuery). Could anyone please tell me if there are plans to complete this aspect of this useful new Query type in the near future? If not, I am willing to give the implementation a try myself and would appreciate any advice. I assume it would be done similarly to the BooleanQuery boost implementation. Thanks in Advance, -Luke --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org