lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28182] - [PATCH] Never write an Analyzer again
Date Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:00:17 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28182>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28182

[PATCH] Never write an Analyzer again





------- Additional Comments From cutting@apache.org  2004-04-06 17:00 -------
I have not looked at this code yet, but I wonder if it is thread friendly? 
There are many cases where an Analyzer might be used concurrently by multiple
threads, e.g., when constructing snippets, or when indexing.  This is difficult
to do without constructing new TokenStreams for each call to
Analyzer.tokenStream(), which it sounds like your implementation does not do.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message