Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32186 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 12:37:55 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 12:37:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 4049 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2004 12:37:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4030 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2004 12:37:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4013 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 12:37:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO services.india.aalayance.com) (203.200.48.226) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 12:37:51 -0000 Received: from ajitendra (unknown [192.168.1.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by services.india.aalayance.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E1DC1894 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:07:49 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <01fd01c40b53$1710e1f0$8d01a8c0@india.aalayance.com> From: "jitender ahuja" To: "Lucene Developers List" References: <01e501c40b3d$5e8d36c0$8d01a8c0@india.aalayance.com> Subject: Re: Relative decrease in stored data due to inverted index organisation Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:04:55 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sir, However, the link does not provide any indication towards the actual index used. Also, no details of any practical situation or example are dealt with. If you can please refer to a link that does elucidate the same, I would be highly thankful. Regards, Jitender ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Hatcher" To: "Lucene Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: Re: Relative decrease in stored data due to inverted index organisation > On Mar 16, 2004, at 4:59 AM, jitender ahuja wrote: > > I intend to know how exactly the Index is stored in lucene, the amount > > of relative decrease offered in the text data size due to the inverted > > index organisation. Is there any Lucene deployment data to clarify > > further. > > http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/fileformats.html > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org