lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Incze Lajos <>
Subject Re: results sorting code in CVS
Date Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:37:34 GMT
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:26:45PM -0800, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Incze Lajos wrote:
> >I've prepared sortkeys for some fields and designated
> >them to be unindexed, untokenized and stored. But I've
> >experienced exceptions, the sortkeys work only if their
> >field is indexed as well.
> >
> >Are there technical reasons or is this a bug?
> There are technical reasons.  The new sorting code requires fields to be 
> indexed.  Unless I am mistaken, whether or not they are stored does not 
> matter.  Typically sort fields will be untokenized.
> Doug

So, the field (just created to act as a sorter) should be
untokenized, not stored and indexed. 



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message