Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87916 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 12:44:36 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 12:44:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 87880 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2004 12:44:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87705 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2004 12:44:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87689 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 12:44:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 12:44:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 4130 invoked by uid 50); 13 Feb 2004 12:44:50 -0000 Date: 13 Feb 2004 12:44:50 -0000 Message-ID: <20040213124450.4129.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26666] - Endless loop since lucene 1.4RC1 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26666 Endless loop since lucene 1.4RC1 ------- Additional Comments From julien.nioche@lingway.com 2004-02-13 12:44 ------- the endless loop is in the next() method of the BooleanScorer. The 'more' variable is set to true even all the subscorers are done. Forcing this value to false with a debugger makes the method return nicely - the number of docs is correct as well. I just need to understand how this more variable has been changed to 'true'. This problem appears with any of my indices in 1.3 or 1.4 version. I tried to create a RAMDirectory in a test file and populate it with some data but the problem does not appear in that case. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org