Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-ID: <002701c3f297$4bd91fd0$3f5cfea9@ace>
From: "Paolo Spadafora" <spadaforap@sympatico.ca>
To: "lucene dev" <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: New Query Type(s)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:10:12 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01C3F26D.62EF41B0"

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C3F26D.62EF41B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Doug,
did you implement such a feature yet? I know i am bothering you with =
these phrasequery issues...sorry...
and, thank you. We all appreciate you.

Paolo.

PS: search engine that support that use a sintax like:
"a b c" w/10 "a f g"=20
for this type of query, users do not like to use "(" much.=20


Jochen wrote:
> Please disregard my prior post. I see that I outed myself as stupid.

This was not a stupid request, but a reasonable one.  In fact I=20
currently have a contract to implement such a feature.  It should show=20
up in the next month or so.

Doug

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jochen [mailto:lucenelist@quontis.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:48 AM
>>To: 'Lucene Developers List'
>>Subject: New Query Type(s)
>>
>>Lucene Gurus:
>>
>>	After looking at and trying out lucene for quite some time (and
>>liking it), I would like to create some advanced queries to speed up =
our
>>system. The first one I need to be as follows:
>>
>>	(+"a b c" +"d e")~10
>>
>>	In other words, I need to run a query in where two phrases (for
>>right now an exact match will be fine) are in some defined proximity =
(in
>>this example, I need "a b c" somewhere close to "d e").
>>
>>	The indexes created nicely support this kind of functionality, and
>>the pieces of are all implemented (PhraseQuery, BooleanQuery, =
PhraseQuery
>>with Slop). However, I believe that they cannot be stringed together =
with
>>the current lucene version, to give me what I need.
>>
>>	I have studied the code and I will write the code to create this
>>type of query (and make it available, if I get it working), but I =
would
>>very
>>much appreciate a high level roadmap from more experienced people =
(i.e.
>>create a new Query Object, change this and that object to do such and =
such
>>...).
>>
>>	Cheers!
>>		Jochen

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C3F26D.62EF41B0--