This conversation is a mystery to me. Is there some different Porter
stemmer than the one available in the Lucene source code?
At 09:03 AM 2/24/2004, you wrote:
>On Feb 24, 2004, at 10:03 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>Is there any reason why the PorterStemmer can't be made public? I know
>>several people have submitted this patch, both separately and as part of
>>other patches. I, for one, am using it in other places as part of my
>>overall search solution and I bet others are as well. I guess I could
>>understand if all stemmers were that way, but the GermanStemmer is
>>publicly available, so it doesn't seem to be consistent.
>>
>>Just wondering...
>
>I think we can make it public. But an alternative is to use the snowball
>code in the sandbox, which has a public PorterStemmer.
>
> Erik
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|