lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Hatcher <e...@ehatchersolutions.com>
Subject Re: Porter Stemmer
Date Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:25:11 GMT
On Feb 24, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Michael McGrady wrote:
> This conversation is a mystery to me.  Is there some different Porter 
> stemmer than the one available in the Lucene source code?

Yes.  As mentioned, the snowball analyzer family lives in the sandbox.  
The CVS repository is jakarta-lucene-sandbox - look under 
contributions/snowball for more details.  Dr. Porter's website contains 
details on why he developed snowball over the original Porter stemmer.

	Erik

>
> At 09:03 AM 2/24/2004, you wrote:
>> On Feb 24, 2004, at 10:03 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> Is there any reason why the PorterStemmer can't be made public?  I 
>>> know several people have submitted this patch, both separately and 
>>> as part of other patches.  I, for one, am using it in other places 
>>> as part of my overall search solution and I bet others are as well.  
>>> I guess I could understand if all stemmers were that way, but the 
>>> GermanStemmer is publicly available, so it doesn't seem to be 
>>> consistent.
>>>
>>> Just wondering...
>>
>> I think we can make it public.  But an alternative is to use the 
>> snowball code in the sandbox, which has a public PorterStemmer.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message