oops ... thanks ... let me try again ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: none none [mailto:korfut@lycos.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:41 PM
> To: Lucene Developers List
> Subject: Re: arbitrary sorting
>
>
> I can't see any zip file in the email, or is it just me?
> bye
>
> ---
> KorfuT
>
> --------- Original Message ---------
>
> DATE: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:21:56
> From: Tim Jones <TJones@hoovers.com>
> To: 'Lucene Developers List' <lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Cc:
>
> >Erik et al,
> >
> >In the attached .zip are the files implementing the functionality I
> >described. I ended up just putting the classes in the
> >org.apache.lucene.search package - that makes the
> constructor problem I
> >mentioned not an issue. Therefore there's not a bug to post the code
> >against, so I'm just attaching it here. Let me know if
> there is something
> >else I should do.
> >
> >For reference, it was the org.apache.lucene.search.TopDocs
> which was the
> >problem - I needed to call it from the SortedIndexSearcher I
> created, but it
> >can't be called from outside the org.apache.lucene.search package.
> >
> >The class to look at is
> org.apache.lucene.search.SortedIndexSearcher. It
> >contains some basic informatin about how to use it.
> >
> >I call this v0.1 because there are some constraints on the
> fields used to
> >sort - they must contain a single term which is an integer
> value. If what
> >I've done looks like a good direction to take in the API,
> though, it would
> >be possible to make the code able to handle arbitrary term
> values, with a
> >little worse performance.
> >
> >Tim
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:56 PM
> >> To: Lucene List
> >> Subject: Re: making a contribution
> >>
> >>
> >> This is great news!
> >>
> >> Please attach your new files to a new Bugzilla issue for
> Lucene (see
> >> Jakarta website for details) and either submit a 'cvs diff
> -u' patch
> >> file along with the issue or just describe what
> constructor needed to
> >> be opened up to public in the issue text.
> >>
> >> Where your contribution would ultimately reside is
> unclear. At the
> >> very least, it can live in the sandbox if you are ok with
> making it
> >> Apache Software License.
> >>
> >> Erik
> >>
> >> On Jan 5, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I've come up with an implementation for doing arbitrary
> sorting in
> >> > lucene -
> >> > it is an implementation of PriorityQueue that can sort by
> >> an arbitrary
> >> > field
> >> > as well as the computed relevancy. It is quite speedy and
> >> should be
> >> > faster
> >> > than doing a sort in the appplication after getting the
> >> results back
> >> > from
> >> > lucene.
> >> >
> >> > I thought I'd make this available to the lucene
> community - what is
> >> > the best
> >> > way to do this? Should it go in "Contributions", or "Sandbox"?
> >> >
> >> > The meat of it for version 0.1 is four classes which
> >> subclass existing
> >> > lucene classes, and one modification to an existing
> lucene class to
> >> > make the
> >> > constructor public so it can be subclassed. So really what
> >> it means is
> >> > adding additional API by "jar -uf lucene.jar ..."
> >> >
> >> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
> http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|