Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59872 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 07:44:43 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 07:44:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 38422 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 07:44:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 38394 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 07:44:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 38381 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 07:44:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host-65-125-35-13.larp.gov) (65.125.35.13) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 07:44:18 -0000 Received: from earthlink.net ([65.174.70.194]) by host-65-125-35-13.larp.gov (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB36nTB09460 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:49:30 -0700 Message-ID: <3FCD960C.1030900@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:51:40 -0700 From: Dmitry Serebrennikov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: lucene 1.3 RC3 compiled with gcj References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Andi Vajda wrote: >I got the latest lucene to compile and run its demo on Linux (redhat 9) and >Mac OS X Panther 10.3.1 using gcc 3.3.2's gcj, compiling to native >executables. > >The demo seems to run. I didn't run the unittests since I didn't attempt to >compile junit with gcj yet. > >Performance seems way faster than the java VM version but somewhat slower than >clucene's C++ port of lucene, indexing a small set of files. I say somewhat as >my set is not that large and my measurements not very thorough, but here are >some numbers for indexing 116k of text in 14 files, as measured on a Powerbook >1Ghz/1GB running Mac OS X Panther 10.3.1: > > lucene 1.3 RC3 with java 1.4.1: 1169 ms > lucene 1.3 RC3 with gcj : 467 ms > clucene 0.8.9 : 365 ms > This is very interesting! I didn't even know about the clucene project, but now I'll definetely have to take a look! I was beginning to think about doing this myself, but if the code already exists - so much the better. gcj sounds great too. Are these times for pure indexing, or is this a time for the program to run. If so, the extra 1 second could just be due to the VM startup time... The numbers would be much less impressive if that was the case. Also, if you have numbers for a larger dataset, please post them here. I am very interested in these results, and I think many others might be also. Thanks. Dmitry. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org