Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88678 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2003 16:55:42 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2003 16:55:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 94504 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2003 16:55:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 94476 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2003 16:55:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 94428 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2003 16:55:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heinrichschiff.igd.fhg.de) (146.140.28.12) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2003 16:55:21 -0000 Received: from pcara (PCARA-ds.igd.fhg.de [146.140.9.73]) by heinrichschiff.igd.fhg.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA19003 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:52:06 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: From: "Gregor Heinrich" To: "'Lucene Developers List'" Subject: RE: [build.xml] RC2 package build issues. Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:55:13 +0100 Message-ID: <009101c3a486$bfc29840$49098c92@pcara> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: <4DFA4A10-1074-11D8-A591-000393A564E6@ehatchersolutions.com> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N If JavaCC is BSD'd open source now, is there any problem having even the jar/zip in the Lucene src distribution in addition to referencing it in the build? Gregor -----Original Message----- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik@ehatchersolutions.com] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:15 PM To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: [build.xml] RC2 package build issues. On Thursday, November 6, 2003, at 10:35 AM, Hani Suleiman wrote: > Why not check in javacc as a build time dep? Good point. Are there any licensing or other reasons not to? I think the original reason was for licensing purposes in previous versions of JavaCC - but that may no longer be a problem. Erik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org