lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kelvin Tan <>
Subject Re: Bug/enhancement request 21921
Date Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:11:01 GMT
Thanks Otis, see attached. The highlighting code is not used in production yet, 
but from initial tests, highlighting works ok. Haven't really bothered to check 
what changes need to be made to support RangeQuery as well.

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 03:15:01 -0700 (PDT), Otis Gospodnetic said:
>I think those two changes are okay.  Please submit a patch.  I imagine
>you already made those two changes in your local copy of Lucene and
>have actually been using it with your highlighting code....?
>--- Kelvin Tan <> wrote:
>>On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Otis Gospodnetic said:
>>>What do you think about a 1.3 release?
>>>I think we should resolve the JavaCC situation and them make the 1.3
>>>release.  Perhaps it would be best to include JavaCC-generated .java
>>>files in the CVS, as Doug described the other day.
>>What about outstanding issues?
>>I submitted a minor enhancement request at
>>Asking for a getPrefix method to PrefixQuery and to make
>>reader) in MultiTermQuery a public method. Am happy to submit patch
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message