Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74249 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 06:29:02 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 06:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 12522 invoked by uid 97); 6 Jun 2003 06:31:27 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 12515 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 06:31:26 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 06:31:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 74022 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2003 06:28:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 74003 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 06:28:58 -0000 Received: from visor.qala.com.sg (210.193.2.43) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 06:28:58 -0000 Received: from kelvin (adsl-210-193-14-17.qala.com.sg [210.193.14.17]) by visor.qala.com.sg (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id h566T7l05452 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:29:07 +0800 (SGT) X-Qala-Anti-Virus: This mail is checked for Viruses by Qala Antivirus Service. Server No. 2 From: Kelvin Tan To: Lucene Developers List X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.64 (1120) - Licensed Version Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:31:07 +0800 In-Reply-To: <818623B5FD23D51193200002B32C076106FE4D0B@excsrv44.mayo.edu> Message-ID: <20036614317.284662@kelvin> Subject: RE: Lucene Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:49:18 -0500, Armbrust, Daniel C. said: >Maybe you should add another page (or section on the page) that= is >for people to list the names of their companies or products that= are >using lucene (with a brief description of what for), as the= current >page only shows that Lucene is used for indexing web pages, or= web >viewable things. > >I know it is being used in a lot of other places (like Eclipse,= or >anything I do with it, etc) that don't get recognition on the= Lucene >page because they just don't fit. > >Dan I tend to agree. We use Lucene to power the search in our= products, and I've no problem appearing in the Powered page, but including the logo on= our website and/or search result pages just to promote Lucene (via the= Powered By) is a different matter (at least from a marketing/branding= standpoint). However, the only challenge of this approach is managing it. When= the logo appears on search results page, it shows that the company= "officially endorses" Lucene's usage. Without it, I can foresee possible problems of= management denying their product uses any open-source software, that the= developer who sent the information to the list did not have authorization to do= so, yadda yadda ad nauseum. Kelvin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org