Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 33892 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2003 20:44:00 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2003 20:44:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27822 invoked by uid 97); 15 Apr 2003 20:45:58 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 27815 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2003 20:45:58 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2003 20:45:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 33623 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2003 20:43:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 33608 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2003 20:43:56 -0000 Received: from etapestry-colo-32-2.onecall.net (HELO darth?bobo.etapestry.com) (216.37.32.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Apr 2003 20:43:56 -0000 Received: from etapestry.com (192.168.1.103 [192.168.1.103]) by darth_bobo.etapestry.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 2R0A83AQ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:45:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3E9C6F08.9060605@etapestry.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:43:52 -0500 From: Scott Ganyo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: Chainable Filter References: <07C5DC39-6F7F-11D7-8281-000393A564E6@ehatchersolutions.com> In-Reply-To: <07C5DC39-6F7F-11D7-8281-000393A564E6@ehatchersolutions.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N What does ChainableFilter do? If it does what I would guess it does by the name, why wouldn't we want all Filters to be "chainable" rather than have a special kind? Scott Erik Hatcher wrote: > +1 on adding ChainableFilter > > > On Tuesday, April 15, 2003, at 03:29 PM, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote: > >> Has there ever been any thought of adding Kelvin Tan's Chainable >> Filter to the Lucene Package proper? Since a few people are using, >> it seems that it would be better to maintain it with the official >> lucene source. >> >> Also, several of the links are broken (including the link to the >> Chainable Filter - hence a second reason for adding it to the >> source... Since there is no other official source) on the >> contributions page. >> >> Dan >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org -- "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org