Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 67896 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2003 07:49:55 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2003 07:49:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 27096 invoked by uid 97); 23 Feb 2003 07:51:42 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 27089 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2003 07:51:42 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2003 07:51:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 67624 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2003 07:49:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 67613 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2003 07:49:53 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2003 07:49:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 27082 invoked by uid 50); 23 Feb 2003 07:51:39 -0000 Date: 23 Feb 2003 07:51:39 -0000 Message-ID: <20030223075139.27081.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16816] - Enhanced FSDirectory that allow lock disable via API X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16816 Enhanced FSDirectory that allow lock disable via API otis@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lucene- |otis@apache.org |dev@jakarta.apache.org | ------- Additional Comments From otis@apache.org 2003-02-23 07:51 ------- John - just so I understand - your change does not add any new functionality, it simply allows you to disable locks by using one of your 2 new methods. Is this because you cannot set the system properly when writing an applet? Couldn't you just call System.setProperty(String key, String value) to set disableLuceneLocks property to true before calling FSDirectory and achieve the same thing? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org