Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 72415 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 15:36:50 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 15:36:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 26535 invoked by uid 97); 29 Jan 2003 15:37:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 26528 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 15:37:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 15:37:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 58870 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2003 15:31:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 58830 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 15:31:32 -0000 Received: from web12705.mail.yahoo.com (216.136.173.242) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 15:31:32 -0000 Message-ID: <20030129153134.62406.qmail@web12705.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.2.72.226] by web12705.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:31:34 PST Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:31:34 -0800 (PST) From: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: Creating a complete Lucene distribution To: Lucene Developers List In-Reply-To: <3E361AEE.7060604@greenninja.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- Jeff Linwood wrote: > Moved to Dev.... > > Sounds like a decent idea to me. I can get to work on making web > pages > for some of these projects, but how many of them are still actively > maintained? I'd link pretty much everything in sandbox/contributions: ant - already linked fulcrum - functional indyo - already linked javascript - functional miscellaneous - single class, functional parsers - single PDF extractor, not sure about functionality searchbean - already linked snowball - already linked webcrawler-LARM - already linked WordNet - functional XML-Indexing-Dem0 - functional There is also projects/appex, but I think that is pretty much abandoned and may get superseded by LARM. Thanks for helping. Otis > Jeff > > Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > >Hello Jeff, > > > >Thanks for offering your help. > >My take on this is that those who are new to Lucene need to get > >acquainted with the core Lucene first before they start needing > things > >like stemmers for different languages, a web crawler, etc. > > > >Then as long as we make it easy for people to read and learn about > each > >Sandbox project and make it easy for them to download their JARs, we > >will make it simple for them to start using those projects. > > > >Currently only Indyo and LARM projects include > overview/tutorial-like > >documentation, but they do not provide pre-built JARs - the only way > to > >get them is from CVS directly, which is a bit more of a pain. > >Snowball stemmers don't have any docs (do they even need them?), but > >the project includes a link to the JAR, which makes it easy for a > >developer to include it in their projects. > > > >SearchBean is buried completely, and so are all other Sandbox > >contributions and projects (circa 10 of them). > > > >If you want to help I think it would be nice to expose some of those > >contributions/projects the same way LARM, Indyo, and Snowball > Stemmers > >are. > >I'm not sure if you feel like doing that, as it's not the most > exciting > >work :) > > > >Thanks, > >Otis > >P.S. > >This thread may be more suitable for lucene-dev - lucene-user > >subscribers probably don't care about this type of decisions much. > > > > > >--- Jeff Linwood wrote: > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>Is there any interest in creating an additional distribution for > >>Lucene that > >>contains some of the code from the sandbox and the contributions? > I > >>was > >>thinking about bringing in the SearchBean, LARM, the optional > >>analyzers, > >>etc. I know there has been some discussion on this list of what > >>should and > >>shouldn't be in the core distribution, but I would like to have the > >>option > >>to download a complete distribution. I think this will make it > much > >>easier > >>to get started developing with Lucene. > >> > >>I guess the first step would be to see if other people on this list > >>would be > >>interested in this project at all, and then the next step would be > to > >>figure > >>out what could go into an application framework build (licensing, > >>dependent > >>library issues, etc.), and to work on an Ant build file that calls > >>the > >>individual component files. > >> > >>I definitely don't want to replace the existing source and binary > >>distributions of Lucene - this would be a larger, more bulky > download > >>for > >>most people. > >> > >>Anyway, shoot it down if you like :) > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Jeff > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org