Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 76409 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2002 07:12:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2002 07:12:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 22204 invoked by uid 97); 17 Sep 2002 07:12:51 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 22185 invoked by uid 97); 17 Sep 2002 07:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 22174 invoked by uid 50); 17 Sep 2002 07:12:50 -0000 Date: 17 Sep 2002 07:12:50 -0000 Message-ID: <20020917071250.22173.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12723] New: - Date fields should not be tokenized. X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12723 Date fields should not be tokenized. Summary: Date fields should not be tokenized. Product: Lucene Version: CVS Nightly - Specify date in submission Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Index AssignedTo: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: hc56@cornell.edu the helper factory method in org.apache.lucene.document.Field : public static final Field Keyword(String name, Date value) specifies the field to be tokenized, which I don't think is correct... the TestDateFilter testcase manually creates the field so the bug is not caught by testcases -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: