lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Carlson <carl...@bookandhammer.com>
Subject Re: [Bug 12137] New: - Can '*' or '?' symbol be used as the first character of a search?
Date Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:35:21 GMT
I think you're right that people want different options and we always 
except contributions, although they may not be officially supported.

Please create a QueryParser.jj which works for you and we can add it to 
the contributions page. If we can get a set of Parsers which work for 
people, maybe that will better steer what should be in the official 
version.

Thanks

--Peter

On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 09:19 AM, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:

> I think that the only difference we have is that you see the Query 
> Parser as a convenience for the app users, while I see it as a 
> convenience to the app users and the app developers.  Its probably a 
> good thing to ship lucene with the query parser that doesn't allow you 
> to do the search that makes an expensive hit.  However, it seems to 
> lead to a bug report every few weeks....
>
> For those of us app developers that need to support a wild card query 
> that can have the wild cards anywhere, I (as a lazy app developer) 
> would like to be able to plug in a different query parser (that has at 
> least been checked by and is hopefully supported as a part of lucene 
> by those that know the lucene internals for validity) and will 
> hopefully be aware that this parser will have worse performance on 
> queries that have leading wildcards because I was warned when I 
> downloaded it, or something along those lines.  Then I as a developer 
> will take measures as appropriate to make sure the users don't create 
> a DOS attack on my system if this performance hit is significant on my 
> index.
>
> I understand that this probably makes you cringe, however as a lucene 
> developer, since now you would have 2 parsers to support.
>
> Given the number of times the question is asked, something probably 
> should be changed... but I don't know which solution that has been 
> given so far should be used (if any) since they all have significant 
> downsides.  As an app developer, I would have to lean toward "make it 
> easy for me - aka make the query parser do the work".  But these are 
> all just my thoughts, and I don't actually have to write the query 
> parser, so its easy for me to say.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message