Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 75109 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2002 20:39:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2002 20:39:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 14427 invoked by uid 97); 12 Jul 2002 20:39:49 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14397 invoked by uid 97); 12 Jul 2002 20:39:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14366 invoked by uid 98); 12 Jul 2002 20:39:45 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <3D2F3751.3010803@apache.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:08:49 -0400 From: "Andrew C. Oliver" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: [ANN] NLucene 1.2b released References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > >Sucks balls that your implementation is GPL. > > +1 - I agree with Jon. Kinda crass to GPL a direct port of apache code. Certainly you're free to do so, but the statement above is very descriptive of my personal perspective on the matter. Secondly, you're probably going to run in violation of your Licenese agreement for .NET. I don't know if they've covered it yet: http://news.com.com/2100-1001-268889.html?legacy=cnet but I wouldn't hold my breath. -Andy >-jon > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: