Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 29810 invoked from network); 20 May 2002 16:20:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 May 2002 16:20:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 10641 invoked by uid 97); 20 May 2002 16:20:18 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10606 invoked by uid 97); 20 May 2002 16:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10583 invoked by uid 98); 20 May 2002 16:20:17 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <011f01c2001a$36553a20$9e01110a@realpulse.com> From: "Eugene Gluzberg" To: "Lucene Developers List" References: Subject: Re: Lucene 1.2 Final Release Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 12:20:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I am for #2. I would also recommend writing an email to the users group to enchorage and try the new rc5 release. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Carlson" To: "Lucene Developers List" Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:58 AM Subject: VOTE: Lucene 1.2 Final Release > Hi all Lucene Committers. > > We released 1.2-RC5 last week (5/14) and it's almost been a week with one > issue that has been resolved (queryParser not supporting "?" as a > wildcard"). We said we would take a vote in a week to decide if we would go > Final Release. > > So, should we > > [ ] 1. Release current code as 1.2 final release > [ ] 2. Wait 5/27 to let the release "bake in" more. > > > It doesn't seem like there has been much activity on the list, so it is hard > to tell how many people have tried out the latest release, but RC-4 has been > out there for a very long time and proven stable. > > > --Peter > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: